Senate blocks congressional stock-trading bill in 53-47 vote
The Senate on September 30, 2026, declined to advance H.R. 7008, the Stop Insider Trading Act, a bill that would restrict stock trading by members of Congress and their immediate families. The vote was 53 in favor and 47 against — short of the three-fifths majority (60 votes) required to invoke cloture and proceed to the bill — so the motion was rejected.
The vote was procedural rather than a vote on the bill itself. It was a cloture vote on the motion to proceed, meaning senators were deciding whether to begin debate on the measure. Because it failed, the Senate did not take up the bill.
H.R. 7008, which the House passed in July 2026, would generally prohibit members of Congress and their spouses and dependent children from purchasing individual stocks in publicly traded companies. Rather than banning ownership outright, it would require a member to publicly disclose an intent to sell a covered investment between 7 and 14 days before the sale, with the notice posted online by the Clerk of the House or the Secretary of the Senate. Violations would carry a fee of at least $2,000 or 10 percent of the transaction value, whichever is greater, plus any net gain. Widely diversified investment funds and certain assets held in trust would be exempt.
As passed by the House, the bill also includes a separate provision requiring voters to present photo identification — a pairing that shaped the Senate debate.
Supporters framed the measure as a step toward restoring public trust. The House committee that advanced the bill said it "prevents Members of Congress, their spouses, and dependent children from profiting off of insider information by banning them from purchasing individual stocks from publicly traded companies." Earlier in the process, Senator Jon Husted said that "86 percent of Americans support banning Members of Congress from purchasing stocks while in office, and 83 percent of Americans support showing a photo ID to vote," arguing both policies were "overwhelmingly supported by Americans."
Opponents — all of the votes against came from Democrats — argued the bill was a vehicle for unrelated voting restrictions and did not go far enough on stock trading. Senator Chris Van Hollen called H.R. 7008 "a political scam," saying it was "a disingenuous attempt to use figleaf new ethics rules to pass a sweeping, unrelated voter suppression law, while not even adequately addressing congressional stock trading." He noted the bill "would allow Members of Congress to sell stock during their term in office" and "permit members to own stock in industries they oversee through their committee assignments." Senator Jeff Merkley, pressing a competing stock-trading measure, said the House bill "leaves people holding the very portfolios that we have to get rid of" and "preserves the conflicts of interest."
Republicans who raised concerns pointed to the bill's breadth. Senator James Lankford, who chairs the Senate Ethics Committee, said he agreed members "should not be trading stocks" but objected that the 31-page bill reached beyond stocks into family farms, small businesses and digital assets, and had not gone through committee: "this needs more work back in the kitchen."
How your senators voted
See how your senators voted
Use your Google, Microsoft, or Apple sign-in to get to your Project Euthyna account. If you don’t have one yet, we’ll create it. We store the census block you live in, and use it to work out who represents you. We do not store your address. We do not sell anything about you, and you can delete your account, and everything in it, whenever you want.
Continuing means you accept our terms of service and privacy policy.