February 27, 2025
Ms. Kamlager-Dove (for herself, Mr. Soto, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mrs. McIver, Mrs. Beatty, Mrs. Watson Coleman, and Ms. Brown) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources
To amend title 54, United States Code, to establish within the National Park Service the National Freedom Settlements Preservation Program, and for other purposes.
Section 1. Short title
This Act may be cited as the Revitalizing and Empowering Freedom Settlements Through Opportunity, Resilience, and Education Act
or the RESTORE Act
.
Sec. 2. Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1)
After the Civil War, over 1,200 Freedmen’s Settlements and Black Towns were established throughout the United States before and after emancipation, with at least 200 towns established by formerly enslaved individuals between 1866 and 1930, creating safe, self-sustaining, and thriving communities away from racial violence and economic discrimination.
(2)
Following the end of slavery, many African-American families who strived for land and housing security established their homes in Black Towns. These towns, founded and governed by recently-emancipated African-American people across the country, were known as Freedmen’s Settlements, Freedom Colonies, or Black Towns.
(3)
African Americans were often denied access to necessary public systems, such as education, housing, and neighborhood infrastructure. Across many areas of the United States, African-American people were barred from utilizing these services because of local segregating laws.
(4)
Freedmen’s Settlements were established around the provision of community services, often structured around schools and churches, as Black residents came together to fulfill necessary resources they had been previously denied.
(5)
Despite these communities being an example of African-American communities’ self-sufficiency amidst a discriminatory society, they were still terrorized by violent, White supremacist groups which initially excluded them from White systems.
(6)
Due to harsh circumstances which included violent attacks, exclusion from water and sanitation systems, as well as urban planning to remove Black Towns from railroads, many Freedmen’s Settlements, which are predominantly in rural areas, are underdeveloped and lack accessibility due to many systemic challenges.
(7)
Freedmen’s Settlements have been disproportionately impacted by economic and community underdevelopment, but have the potential to become thriving communities with proper support and investment that honors their rich history, meets the current needs of their residents, and uplifts community resilience and sustainable development.
(8)
Many of these Freedmen’s Settlements and Black Towns were destroyed by southern domestic terrorists, or otherwise became impoverished by centuries of public and private divestment. This includes uncompensated enslaved labor, failed Reconstruction, and the unmet Freedmen’s Bureau’s postemancipation promises to transition people who were formerly enslaved into the American economy, Jim Crow laws, economic and housing discrimination through redlining, public housing, and transportation policies, and environmental racism. Some towns withstood systemic racism and racial violence, and serve as examples of community resilience.
(9)
It is difficult to fully quantify and understand the history and current status of all the Freedmen’s Settlements in the United States due to lack of research and investment in analyzing, preserving, and supporting these historic settlements, towns, and communities, with a large part of this history held by the descendants of the founders and residents.
(10)
A lack of accurate information is typical of African-American history following the Civil War, due to disenfranchisement of African Americans from predominantly White, institution-based documentation.
(11)
Freedmen’s Settlements were often—
(A)
poorly recorded;
(B)
excluded from historical maps and databases;
(C)
recognized only through oral traditions and community memory; and
(D)
suffered from the negative consequences of systemic racism, such as the calculated exclusion from crucial infrastructure like water systems or railroads.
(12)
Recognizing and providing resources for Freedman’s Settlements through Federal identification, designation of historic status, comprehensive documentation, funding, and physical commemoration would lead to greater equity and investment in historically disadvantaged communities that have faced centuries of racism, discrimination, environmental and climate injustices, and violence.
(13)
A handful of former Freedmen’s Settlements have received State or local designation for their historic status, offering them an opportunity for preservation and public acknowledgment, such as the Freedmen’s Town Historic District in Houston, Texas.
(14)
There is an ongoing call, gaining much traction today, to preserve and document the history of Freedmen’s Settlements, leading to projects such as the Texas Freedom Colonies Project, the Mapping Blackness Project, as well as the Freedmen’s Bureau Search Portal created by the National Museum of African-American History and Culture, among others.
(15)
The presence and location of historic Freedmen’s Settlements should be recorded. There should be coordinated national, State, local, and Tribal efforts to preserve and restore Freedmen’s Settlements.
(16)
Freedmen’s Settlements are an integral component of the heritage of the United States, and their preservation and revitalization crucial for the communities themselves as well as a more complete understanding of American history and the ongoing struggle for racial equity. Establishing a program to recognize previously underserved Freedmen’s Settlements would help communities identify and record these settlements, preserve local history, and better inform development decisions and community planning.
(17)
By investing in the preservation of Freedom Settlements, which include Freedmen’s Settlements, Freedom Colonies, and Black Towns, the United States has an opportunity to honor the legacy of self-determination and community-building that these settlements represent, while also creating models for sustainable, equitable community development that can inform broader efforts to address historical inequities and build stronger, more inclusive communities across the Nation.
Sec. 3. National Freedom Settlements Preservation Program
Division B of subtitle III of title 54, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
3092 National Freedom Settlements Preservation Program
309201. Definitions
In this chapter:
(1) Advisory Committee
The term Advisory Committee means the Freedom Settlements Advisory Committee established under section 309209.
(2) Freedom Settlement
The term Freedom Settlement means a community established by formerly enslaved African Americans following emancipation (also commonly referred to as ‘Freedmen’s Settlements’,
Freedom Colonies, or ‘Black Towns’).(3) Program
The term Program means the National Freedom Settlements Preservation Program established under section 309204.
(4) Study
The term Study means the study required under section 309205.
309202. Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to—
(1)
recognize the importance of Freedom Settlements, including communities established by formerly enslaved people, free African Americans, and their descendants, the sacrifices made by those who used the Underground Railroad in search of freedom, equality, and material security, and the vision of Settlements founders; and
(2)
authorize the Secretary of the Interior to coordinate and facilitate Federal and non-Federal activities to identify, research, record, preserve, commemorate, honor, and interpret the history of Freedom Settlements, their significance as a crucial element in the evolution of African-American history, and their relevance in fostering the spirit of racial justice and wealth equality.
309203. National Freedom Settlements Preservation Program
(a) In general
The Secretary shall establish within the Service a program to be known as the
National Freedom Settlements Preservation Program.(b) Duties of secretary
In carrying out the Program, the Secretary shall develop a program for the provision of grants in accordance with section 309204(a), in consultation with—
(1)
organizations, experts, and community leaders who serve African-American communities;
(2)
organizations involved with Freedom Settlements; and
(3)
residents and descendants of residents of Freedom Settlements.
(c) Donations
The Secretary may accept donations of funds, services, or property for the purposes of carrying out this chapter.
(d) Consent of private property owner required
Freedom Settlements may only be considered for a grant under the Program—
(1)
with the consent of the owner of the applicable property; and
(2)
at the request of an individual, landowner, private or nonprofit organization, State, Tribal, or local government, or other entity.
(e) Scope
The Secretary may consider the following for inclusion in the Program:
(1)
All units and programs of the National Park Service determined by the Secretary to pertain to Freedom Settlements.
(2)
Historic properties pertaining to Freedom Settlements.
(3)
Other governmental and nongovernmental facilities and programs of an educational, research, or interpretive nature that are directly related to Freedom Settlements.
309204. Authority to award grants
(a) In general
In carrying out the Program, the Secretary may award grants to eligible entities described in subsection (b)(1) for—
(1)
the identification of Freedom Settlements that may qualify for the Program;
(2)
cultural and heritage preservation, restoration, and tourism program development of Freedom Settlements;
(3)
related research and documentation of Freedom Settlements;
(4)
capacity-building to operate and maintain recognized Freedom Settlement sites; and
(5)
educational programming about Freedom Settlement history.
(b) Applications
(1) Eligible entities
Each of the following entities are eligible for a grant under the Program:
(A)
A property owner of a property associated with Freedom Settlements.
(B)
Tribal, State, or local governments.
(C)
Community organizations that have demonstrated local leadership and a commitment to community development.
(2) Submission
To be eligible for a grant under this section, an eligible entity shall submit to the Secretary an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may require.
(c) Authorization of appropriations
There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $3,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2031.
309205. Freedom Settlements Study
(a) Study
The Secretary shall conduct a study to identify key sites that—
(1)
illustrate the period in American history when formerly enslaved African Americans established Freedom Settlements to provide their communities with education, security, and belonging which were previously denied under slavery and discriminatory laws; and
(2)
may be suitable for inclusion in the Program.
(b) Consultation
The Study shall be conducted with public involvement and in consultation with—
(1)
the Advisory Committee;
(2)
State and local officials;
(3)
educational institutions; and
(4)
other interested organizations and individuals.
309206. Registry
The Secretary shall maintain and regularly update a comprehensive registry of Freedom Settlements, as they are identified and verified through the research and documentation process outlined in this chapter, including but not limited to historically documented settlements engaged in preservation efforts, such as—
(1)
Nicodemus, Kansas;
(2)
Africatown, Alabama;
(3)
Mound Bayou, Mississippi;
(4)
Eatonville, Florida;
(5)
Boley, Oklahoma;
(6)
Hobson City, Alabama;
(7)
Allensworth, California;
(8)
Freedmen’s Town Historic District, Houston, Texas;
(9)
Independence Heights, Texas;
(10)
Mossville, Louisiana;
(11)
Oberlin Village, North Carolina;
(12)
Kinloch, Missouri;
(13)
New Philadelphia, Illinois;
(14)
Rosewood, Florida;
(15)
Weeksville, New York;
(16)
Freedman’s Village, Arlington, Virginia;
(17)
Sandy Ground, New York;
(18)
Princeville, North Carolina;
(19)
Greenwood District (Black Wall Street), Tulsa, Oklahoma; and
(20)
Freedmen’s Town, Dallas, Texas.
309207. Private Property Protection
Nothing in this chapter—
(1)
authorizes the Secretary to require or affect the management or use of private property without the written consent of the owner of the private property; or
(2)
prohibits the Secretary from providing land management guidance or requirements relating to private property as a condition of a grant provided to the owner of the private property under this chapter.
309208. Cooperative agreements and memoranda of understanding
The Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements and memoranda of understanding with, and provide technical assistance to, the heads of other Federal agencies, States, units of local government, Tribal governments, regional governmental bodies, African American-serving groups, residents and descendants of residents of Freedom Settlements, scholars of this specific history, and nonprofit organizations such as the Chisholm Legacy Project, Ubuntu Climate, and the Texas Freedom Colonies Project, educational institutions, and private entities—
(1)
to achieve the purposes of this chapter;
(2)
to facilitate cooperation with the Advisory Committee; and
(3)
to ensure effective coordination of the Federal elements and non-Federal elements provided a grant or other assistance under the Program with System units and programs of the Service.
309209. Freedom Settlements Advisory Committee
(a) In general
In carrying out the Study under section 309205, the Secretary shall establish a committee to be known as the
Freedom Settlements Advisory Committeeto assist with the Study.(b) Composition
The Advisory Committee shall be composed of members, appointed by the Secretary, who—
(1)
are residents or descendants of residents of Freedom Settlements;
(2)
have demonstrated expertise in—
(A)
African-American history; or
(B)
Reconstruction or Jim Crow era history; or
(3)
are community leaders and advocates for African-American community heritage, preservation, and development.