(A)

by redesignating subparagraphs (I) through (N) as subparagraphs (P) through (U), respectively;

(B)

by redesignating subparagraph (H) as subparagraph (N);

(C)

by redesignating subparagraph (G) as subparagraph (K);

(D)

by redesignating subparagraphs (E) and (F) as subparagraphs (H) and (I), respectively;

(E)

by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (D) as subparagraphs (C) through (F), respectively;

(F)

by inserting before subparagraph (C), as so redesignated, the following:

(A) 9–1–1 request for emergency assistance

The term 9–1–1 request for emergency assistance means a communication, such as voice, text, picture, multimedia, or any other type of data, that is sent to an emergency communications center for the purpose of requesting emergency assistance.

(B) Artificial intelligence

The term artificial intelligence has the meaning given the term in section 5002 of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 (15 U.S.C. 9401).;

(G)

by inserting after subparagraph (F), as so redesignated, the following:

(G) Commonly accepted standards

The term commonly accepted standards means the technical standards followed by the communications industry for network, device, and Internet Protocol connectivity that—

(i)

enable interoperability; and

(ii)

are—

(I)

developed and approved by a standards development organization that is accredited by an American standards body (such as the American National Standards Institute) or an equivalent international standards body in a process that—

(aa)

is open for participation by any person; and

(bb)

provides for a conflict resolution process;

(II)

subject to an open comment and input process before being finalized by the standards development organization;

(III)

consensus-based; and

(IV)

made publicly available once approved.;

(H)

by inserting after subparagraph (I), as so redesignated, the following:

(J) Emergency communications center

(i) In general

The term emergency communications center means—

(I)

a facility that—

(aa)

is designated to receive a 9–1–1 request for emergency assistance; and

(bb)

performs 1 or more of the functions described in clause (ii); or

(II)

a public safety answering point, as defined in section 222 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 222).

(ii) Functions described

The functions described in this clause are the following:

(I)

Processing and analyzing 9–1–1 requests for emergency assistance and information and data related to such requests.

(II)

Dispatching appropriate emergency response providers.

(III)

Transferring or exchanging 9–1–1 requests for emergency assistance and information and data related to such requests to or with 1 or more other emergency communications centers or emergency response providers.

(IV)

Analyzing any communications received from emergency response providers.

(V)

Supporting incident command functions.;

(I)

by inserting after subparagraph (K), as so redesignated, the following:

(L) Interoperability

The term interoperability means the capability of emergency communications centers to receive 9–1–1 requests for emergency assistance and information and data related to such requests, such as location information and callback numbers from a person initiating the request, then process and share the 9–1–1 requests for emergency assistance and information and data related to such requests with other emergency communications centers and emergency response providers without the need for proprietary interfaces and regardless of jurisdiction, equipment, device, software, service provider, or other relevant factors.

(M) Internet exchange point

The term internet exchange point means a physical building and related infrastructure that—

(i)

enables internet service providers, transport networks, mobile networks, content delivery networks, artificial intelligence systems, and other network operators to directly interconnect and exchange data traffic among their networks;

(ii)

provides neutral, nondiscriminatory access to all network operators in good standing under published and reasonable rates and terms with no requirement for the purchase of network services as a condition of access; and

(iii)

provides access to a shared internet exchange (commonly known as an IX) switching fabric that enables participating networks to establish Border Gateway Protocol sessions, whether directly between participants or through a shared route server.; and

(J)

by inserting after subparagraph (N), as so redesignated, the following:

(O) Next Generation 9–1–1

The term Next Generation 9–1–1 means an Internet Protocol-based system that—

(i)

ensures interoperability;

(ii)

is secure;

(iii)

employs commonly accepted standards;

(iv)

enables emergency communications centers to receive, process, and analyze all types of 9–1–1 requests for emergency assistance;

(v)

acquires and integrates additional information useful to handling 9–1–1 requests for emergency assistance; and

(vi)

supports sharing information related to 9–1–1 requests for emergency assistance among emergency communications centers and emergency response providers.;

(A)

by striking clause (ii);

(B)

by striking Reallocation to other eligible entities.— and all that follows through The Assistant Secretary and inserting Reallocation to other eligible entities due to application failures.—The Assistant Secretary;

(C)

by redesignating subclauses (I) and (II) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly; and

(D)

in clause (ii), as so redesignated, by striking subclause (I) of this clause and inserting clause (i) of this subparagraph;

(A)

by striking paragraphs (3) through (6);

(B)

by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly;

(C)

in subparagraph (A), as so redesignated, by adding and at the end;

(D)

in subparagraph (B), as so redesignated, by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting a period;

(E)

by striking An eligible entity may use grant funds received under this section to competitively award subgrants for— and inserting the following:

(1) Permissible uses

An eligible entity may use grant funds received under this section to competitively award subgrants for—; and

(F)

by adding at the end the following:

(2) Use of remaining amounts for projects relating to AI-supportive telecommunications infrastructure, workforce development, public safety, and national security

(A) Definitions

In this paragraph:

(i) Eligible project

The term eligible project means a project for—

(I)

the construction of —

(aa)

lit or dark fiber that is to be made available on a wholesale basis;

(bb)

conduit systems, manholes, in-line amplifier facilities, and related infrastructure;

(cc)

carrier-neutral internet exchange points;

(dd)

mobile wireless communications infrastructure;

(ee)

facilities that house workforce development programs narrowly targeted to address worker shortages in the telecommunications, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and electrical distribution sectors, to the extent such programs promote or facilitate the deployment of broadband infrastructure;

(ff)

submarine cable systems;

(gg)

carrier-neutral submarine cable landing stations;

(hh)

mobile wireless communications infrastructure on educational facilities, including those on Tribal lands, that increases coverage, capacity, resiliency, or security capabilities of connectivity for public safety purposes; or

(ii)

a combination of infrastructure described in any of items (aa) through (hh);

(II)

the planning and implementation of workforce development programs narrowly targeted to address worker shortages in the telecommunications, artificial intelligence, and electrical distribution sectors, to the extent such programs promote or facilitate the deployment or meaningful use of broadband infrastructure;

(III)

the planning, implementation, or maintenance of Next Generation 9–1–1 in emergency communications centers;

(IV)

data collection, mapping, and planning;

(V)

resources for tools, personnel, systems, training, or technical assistance to accelerate, streamline, or improve the efficiency of permitting processes necessary for broadband deployment; and

(VI)

any use determined necessary by the Assistant Secretary to facilitate the goals of the Program.

(ii) Remaining amounts

The term remaining amounts, with respect to the allocations to an eligible entity under subsection (c), means any amounts remaining from those allocations upon approval of the eligible entity’s final proposal under subsection (e)(4).

(B) Use of remaining amounts

(i) Subgrant program

Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, an eligible entity shall use all remaining amounts to establish a competitive subgrant program to support 1 or more eligible projects.

(ii) Noncompetitive subgrants to workforce development boards

If an eligible entity wishing to support an eligible project described in subparagraph (A)(i)(II) (relating to workforce development programs) has a workforce development board, the eligible entity may satisfy clause (i) of this subparagraph by awarding a subgrant to the workforce development board without conducting a competitive subgrant program.

(C) Prohibited use of funds

A subgrant awarded under subparagraph (B) may not be used for the construction, operation, or expansion of a data center that has the primary purpose of processing and storing digital information.

(D) Priority

In awarding subgrants under subparagraph (B), an eligible entity shall prioritize proposals that—

(i)

develop infrastructure described in subparagraph (A) in 1 or more regions that are unserved or underserved by such infrastructure, including on Tribal lands;

(ii)

are strategically critical for public safety, national security, or economic development;

(iii)

produce a qualified workforce to support the telecommunications, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and electrical distribution sectors, to the extent such proposals promote or facilitate the deployment or meaningful use of broadband infrastructure;

(iv)

directly support enhanced connectivity to, or network capabilities of, military installations, national laboratories, or other relevant Federal facilities, including facilities of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration;

(v)

advance the cybersecurity or meaningful use of projects for which such subgrants are awarded;

(vi)

support direct network interconnection between edge artificial intelligence data centers and local networks, including internet service providers, mobile networks, and research and education networks;

(vii)

enhance the network capacity, resiliency, hardening, or geographic reach of telecommunications backbone infrastructure; and

(viii)

accomplish 2 or more of the objectives described in clauses (i) through (vii).

(E) Limited operational expenses

A subgrant awarded under subparagraph (B) may include funding for reasonable projected operations and maintenance expenses for a period of 24 months after completion of the project, not to exceed 15 percent of the amount of the subgrant.

(F) Matching requirement

(i) Amount

Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, in awarding subgrants under subparagraph (B), other than a subgrant awarded for an eligible activity described in subparagraph (A)(i)(III), an eligible entity shall require a subgrantee to provide a contribution of not less than 25 percent of project costs.

(ii) Waiver

Upon request by a subgrantee, an eligible entity may reduce or waive the required matching contribution under clause (i).

(iii) Source of match

A matching contribution under clause (i) may include in-kind contributions made by a subgrantee or a third-party entity.

(G) Interstate projects

Two or more eligible entities may execute memoranda of agreement between or among one another to facilitate subgrant awards under subparagraph (B) for eligible projects that span 2 or more eligible entities.

(H) Challenge process for eligible fiber infrastructure projects

(i) In general

A subgrant awarded by an eligible entity under subparagraph (B) for the construction of lit or dark fiber that is to be made available on a wholesale basis, as described in subparagraph (A)(i)(I), shall be subject to a mandatory public challenge process administered by the eligible entity.

(ii) Public notice and challenge window

Before awarding a subgrant described in clause (i), an eligible entity shall—

(I)

make the proposed project routes and other relevant attributes available on a publicly accessible website maintained by the eligible entity for a period of not less than 14 days (in this subparagraph referred to as the public notice and challenge window); and

(II)

allow for the submission of challenges during the public notice and challenge window on the grounds that the proposed project constitutes overbuilding.

(iii) Criteria for valid challenges

A proposed project described in clause (i) may only be challenged under clause (ii)(II) if the challenger demonstrates that—

(I)

a substantially similar fiber route already exists between defined locations;

(II)

the existing fiber route is available to wholesale customers on comparable terms and conditions, including price, capacity, and service level agreements;

(III)

the existing infrastructure meets the same intended use as the proposed project, including latency, resiliency, and interconnection capabilities; and

(IV)

the proposed project does not substantially improve resilient, redundant, or alternative connection paths.

(iv) Determination

(I) In general

Upon receipt of a timely challenge under clause (ii)(II), an eligible entity shall conduct a review and issue a final determination as to the validity of the challenge not later than 30 days after the close of the public notice and challenge window.

(II) Factors for determination

An eligible entity shall base a final determination under subclause (I) on a holistic review of route similarity, capacity, availability, service offerings, pricing, and strategic justification.

(v) Transparency required

An eligible entity shall publish a summary of each challenge received under clause (ii)(II) and the corresponding final determination issued under clause (iv)(I), including the rationale for any decision to uphold or reject the challenge.

(vi) Limitation

The existence of any fiber route that is not made available on reasonable wholesale terms, or that does not meet the intended purpose or technical performance of the proposed project, shall not be grounds for a valid challenge under clause (ii)(II).

(I) Rule of construction regarding Next Generation 9–1–1

Nothing in this paragraph, including the authority to use remaining amounts for the planning, implementation, or maintenance of Next Generation 9–1–1 in emergency communications centers as described in subparagraph (A)(i)(III), shall be construed to expand or otherwise modify the definition of the term ‘originating service provider’ in section 9.28 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation).

(J) Rule of construction regarding unspent funds

Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or prevent an eligible entity from returning to the Treasury any amounts allocated to the eligible entity under subsection (c) that are not spent.